The chance of catching a contagious disease by being spit on is low. According to the World Health Organization coughing, sneezing, or spitting, can spread tuberculosis. In the first half of the 20th century the National Association for the Study and Prevention of Tuberculosis, the precursor to the American Lung Association, and state affiliates had educational campaigns against spitting to reduce the chance of spreading tuberculosis. Spittoons became far less common after the influenza epidemic of 1918, and their use has since virtually disappeared, though each justice of the Supreme Court of the United States continues to be provided with a personal one. Spittoons (also known as cuspidors) were used openly during the 19th century to provide an acceptable outlet for spitters. By the early 1700s, spitting had become seen as something which should be concealed, and by 1859 it had progressed to being described by at least one etiquette guide as "at all times a disgusting habit." Sentiments against spitting gradually transitioned from being included in adult conduct books to so obvious as to only appear in guides for children to not be included in conduct literature even for children "because most children have the spitting ban internalized well before learning how to read." Advisory on the wall of a building in New Orleans Then, frequent spitting was part of everyday life, and at all levels of society, it was thought ill-mannered to suck back saliva to avoid spitting. Social attitudes towards spitting have changed greatly in Western Europe since the Middle Ages. It can represent a "symbolical regurgitation" or an act of intentional contamination. Spitting upon another person, especially onto the face, is a global sign of anger, hatred, disrespect or contempt. Spitting in public is considered rude and a social taboo in many parts of the world including the West, while in some other parts of the world it is considered more socially acceptable. Spitting of small saliva droplets can also happen unintentionally during talking, especially when articulating ejective and implosive consonants. The act is often done to get rid of unwanted or foul-tasting substances in the mouth, or to get rid of a large buildup of mucus. Spitting is the act of forcibly ejecting saliva or other substances from the mouth. JSTOR ( February 2014) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message)Ī cartoon of Charlie Chaplin spitting on the ground.Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Call (612) 979-1112 or submit an online contact form.This article needs additional citations for verification. We'll provide the compassionate yet aggressive defense you need to fight your charge. If you've been charged with assault or any other crime in Minneapolis, reach out to Brockton D. If the person was a correctional employee or secure treatment facility personnel, a conviction may result in: If the person spat upon was a peace officer, a conviction may result in: The punishments a person could face for spitting on another person depend on what role the alleged victim had. Potential Penalties for Spittingįelonies are considered the most serious offenses. To be charged under this statute, the offense must have been committed while the officer was carrying out their lawful duties. That's because Minnesota has a law that explicitly prohibits a person from "intentionally throw or otherwise transfer bodily fluids or feces at or onto person."įourth-degree assault can be charged as a felony when it is committed against: Now, although Davis did not cause bodily injury (he may not have even intended to cause such a result), by spitting on the officers, he has committed a crime. As they're closing the door on him, Davis spits on a second officer. When officers arrive and try to arrest the man, a scuffle ensues, during which Davis spits on one of the officers.Įventually, the officers get Davis in cuffs and proceed to take him to their squad car. Take this scenario: The cops are called because a man, Davis, is shouting profanities and threats in a hotel lobby. Projecting Bodily Fluids on a Peace Officer In some circumstances, spitting on another person can be an assault crime, and depending on who the alleged victim was, it can be charged as a felony. And while such conduct may be prohibited under a few of Minnesota's assault laws, it's not the only type of action that can be considered a chargeable offense. When a person thinks of an assaultive offense being committed, images of someone inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm may be conjured.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |